Runtime behavioral safety, compliance, and identity for autonomous AI agents. The SSL/TLS of the agent era.
Agent Safety TAM by 2028
Agent Incident Damages in 2025
Monitoring Overhead
To Integrate
Agents are the new software — but there's no SSL, no certificate authority, no security infrastructure. Real incidents are already happening.
Fabricated a bereavement discount policy. Company held legally liable for the AI's promises. Cost: lawsuit + reputational damage.
Agreed to sell a $76,000 Tahoe for $1 after a prompt injection attack. The "binding agreement" went viral.
Fortune 500 companies report agents sending wrong pricing, accessing unauthorized data, and making erroneous financial transactions. Est. $50M+ damages in 2025.
Built for chatbots, not for autonomous multi-step agent workflows.
| Current Approach | Why It Fails for Agents |
|---|---|
| Prompt Guardrails (Lakera) | Agents execute multi-step workflows — injection can happen at any step, through any tool |
| Model Security (Protect AI) | The model is fine; the agent's behavior is the risk |
| Governance Platforms (Credo AI) | Static compliance doesn't work for real-time autonomous decisions |
| Evaluation Tools (Patronus AI) | Pre-deployment evals can't catch runtime behavioral drift |
Comprehensive runtime safety built specifically for autonomous AI agents.
Full behavioral tracing for every agent action. Integration in 3 lines of code. Async monitoring with near-zero performance impact.
⚡ <5ms overheadGraduated response system — not binary block/allow. Monitors action sequences for anomalous patterns. Automatically isolates compromised agents.
🔒 <20ms sync latencyAutomated EU AI Act, NIST RMF, and ISO 42001 compliance. Continuous monitoring, not point-in-time audits. Board-ready AI risk dashboards.
📋 Real-time audit trailCryptographic agent identities, trust scoring based on behavioral history, cross-agent trust verification. Open protocol with commercial management.
🔐 Metcalfe's Law moatWhen cloud emerged, people asked "Won't AWS add security?" They did — but CrowdStrike ($80B), Palo Alto ($125B), and Zscaler ($30B) were built because enterprises need specialized, neutral security.
Agents are multi-framework, multi-model, multi-cloud. Enterprises need cross-platform safety.
Generic guardrails can't keep up with agent-specific behavioral threats. Deep expertise wins.
You can't trust the AI provider to audit their own model's safety. Independent trust is essential.
Every monitored agent improves anomaly detection for all customers. CrowdStrike/Datadog dynamics.
100,000 enterprises will deploy AI agents by 2028. Every one of them needs trust infrastructure.
Bottom-up TAM: 100K enterprises × $300K avg safety spend
Addressable today: 15K enterprises × $100K avg spend
AI safety market growth rate 2024-2028
The window for building the trust layer is open right now — and closing fast.
Salesforce shipped 2B+ Agentforce transactions. Microsoft Copilot agents are in production. Anthropic's MCP ecosystem is exploding. Agents aren't coming — they're here.
MCP and A2A are creating agent-to-agent infrastructure — but with zero trust layer. It's HTTP without HTTPS. The SSL moment is now.
Full enforcement August 2026. Every company deploying AI agents in Europe must prove compliance. This is mandatory, not optional.
Cisco acquired Robust Intelligence. F5 acquired CalypsoAI. Enterprise security vendors are buying AI safety companies — proving the exit path.
Conservative projections based on comparable company trajectories (CrowdStrike, Datadog, Palo Alto Networks early growth).
| Year | ARR | Customers | Gross Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | $3M | 20 | 68% |
| Year 2 | $18M | 80 | 74% |
| Year 3 | $65M | 300 | 80% |
| Year 4 | $180M | 700 | 84% |
| Year 5 | $400M | 1,500 | 87% |
$500M – $2B
Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, Microsoft, Salesforce
$5B – $10B
At $400M+ ARR with 87% gross margins
Join the private beta. Ship AI agents with confidence.